Saving the Tuolumne River's native salmon

After reading The Bee's recent editorial about the Tuolumne River's native salmon population being at "high risk" of extinction, according to a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service report, Modesto Irrigation District general manager Allen Short wanted to talk over a few things. 

Over sandwiches, he agreed that the native salmon are in crisis. He just didn't agree with a USFWS scientist that much higher water releases from Don Pedro Reservoir would improve the salmon's situation. Instead, Short pointed to six "stressors" for salmon, and emphasized his belief that predation (other fish making meals of salmon trying to swim to the ocean) is among the most significant. Bass, in particular, he pointed out, like to eat young salmon. There is no doubt this is true. It's also true that certain areas of the river, especially the old rock quarries west of LaGrange, have become salmon "killing zones" due to the large number of bass living in the deep holes. 

Among other suggestions, Short would like to see more fishermen on the Tuolumne catch more bass -- and keeping as much as they can catch. He believes removing limits from bass would reduce the population. Knocking down the number of bass, he says, would enhance the chances of salmon to make it at least to the delta. There, unfortunately, they would face a host of other lethal problems -- dissolved oxygen, the irresistable force of the state's massive pumps, introduced toxins and an even greater number of predators. He says the California Department of Fish & Game was told to address the predation issue a decade ago, but has so far not offered any workable solution.

It's unlikley that any single solution will save the salmon. If it was that easy, smart people like Short and the USFWS's Carl Mesick would most likely be on the same page. It's important that public discussions of these issues begin. Because there is one thing that Short and Mesick and The Bee agrees on: We should -- and can -- save the Tuolumne's native salmon.

Really

I thought that global warming and pesticides in the Delta were going to be the culprit.  Are those the same bass that like to eat the Delta Smelt?  We need to open up Bass season to all who can stave off this environmental disaster.  Then we need to go after the Brown Pelicans that the Delta natives say now inhabit the sloughs and back waters of the Delta and are very adept at feeding on small salmonids.  In fact the locals farmers say that its like watching flights come in, fill up and fly on so that the next wave can go fill up.  Maybe those thing called natural selection and cycles are real and this is just evidence of one more?  

i've got a fishing pole ...

You bring the bait, and we'll see if the bass can withstand our enticements.

bring your poontoon boat and

bring your poontoon boat and we'll drift the tuolumne and i'll show you what eats the most salmon.allen short doesn't know what he's talking about!

one of the problems

The reason the department of fish and game wont take the limit of the bass, both stripers and black bass is because they make money off of them. They are the major reason the salmon are not surviving under the current condititons. You have to remember that these rivers used to flood and push the salmon out to the ocean. The river bottoms were full of mud and it was hard for the preditors to see the salmon. Now the rivers are low and clean and the banks have been rocked which is the best habitat for the bass to hide in. The only sollution now is to require the irrigation districts to place hatcheries on the rivers and then transport them down to the bay. Probably will never happen since they have the legislators eating out of there hand.

Very useful website, thanks

Very useful website, thanks for this article and very interesting  design, thanks.
lipitor online
acai effects